The STRAT Hotel, Casino & Tower: a high-variance stay

Public-review snapshot

The STRAT Hotel, Casino & Tower presents a difficult split between its broad public reputation and the detailed experiences supplied here. Its Google rating is 4 from 64223 reviews, suggesting that many stays are satisfactory. This smaller review sample is markedly more critical, however, with repeated concerns about room condition, cooling, cleanliness and the handling of complaints.

There are positives. One guest described the front desk team as friendly and accommodating at arrival, while another returning visitor considered the location great and reported that three previous stays had passed without problems. A clean, comfortable and cool room was also reported. The difficulty is consistency. Several guests encountered issues significant enough to seek help or reconsider returning.

Rooms and maintenance

Room quality appears to vary considerably. One review describes ineffective air conditioning and unusually hot corridors, making the journey to and from the room uncomfortable. Another guest received a room that was clean, cool and comfortable, so cooling problems may not affect every part of the property.

Other maintenance complaints include a non-working telephone, an unpleasant smell when the bathroom fan was switched on and a bathroom without what the guest considered a proper door. The most serious cleanliness account alleges that a live bed bug was found around midnight. That is a single report rather than proof of a property-wide problem, but it is serious enough to justify inspecting the bed and room immediately after arrival.

These reports point to the value of testing the air conditioning, telephone and bathroom fixtures before unpacking. If something is wrong, raising it promptly gives the hotel an opportunity to arrange a room change.

Check-in, staff and charges

Service feedback is inconsistent. The warm welcome and accommodating front desk described by one guest contrasts with another account of a rude response during a room-change request. A separate reviewer found check-in slow and considered the available kiosk unintuitive.

Post-stay administration also caused concern. One guest disputed a smoking-violation charge applied after checkout and said it arrived without prior notice. Travellers should therefore read the smoking policy carefully, document the condition of the room at arrival and review the final bill. These precautions are sensible at any large casino hotel, but they feel particularly relevant given the supplied complaints.

Location and overall verdict

The location divides opinion. One repeat guest called it great, while another found it poorly suited to their plans and felt uncomfortable walking in certain surrounding directions, particularly after dark. The hotel may work better for guests who know where their activities are located and expect to use transport rather than explore the immediate area entirely on foot.

Overall, The STRAT is best approached as a high-variance option rather than a dependable default. Its large-scale hotel and casino format, potentially convenient location and occasional reports of helpful staff remain appealing. Yet the severity of the room, cleanliness and service complaints lowers confidence. It is most suitable for a short stay by flexible travellers willing to inspect their room promptly, request changes when necessary and keep careful records of any issues or charges.

Plan the rest of the trip

• More hotels in United States
• What else is worth booking in Las Vegas, United States
• All United States travel reviews
• Browse every destination we cover