Moxy NYC Times Square: compact rooms, standout service

The review consensus

Moxy NYC Times Square holds a Google rating of 4.1 from 6532 reviews. The supplied public feedback presents a hotel with a clear trade-off: rooms can feel small, while attentive staff and a distinctive guest experience frequently leave a stronger impression.

Several reviewers describe stays that were smooth, comfortable and handled with genuine care. Service praise is unusually specific. Front-desk employees are credited with patience, professionalism and personal attention, while the luggage-storage team also receives positive recognition. One guest found the entire arrival process hassle-free, including help with an early check-in.

That consistency is not universal. Another family reported a frustrating arrival involving an unexpected security authorization and additional charges despite having prepaid. The authorization was understood to be refundable, but the amount and timing still came as a surprise.

Rooms and comfort

Room size is the most obvious consideration. One couple initially found their room small, then adjusted and described it as cozy enough for resting and recharging during a three-night visit. This suggests the hotel is better approached as a compact base than as a place for spreading out for long periods.

A couple travelling with their daughter also booked a double room for a family holiday, although their review focused more on check-in than comfort. Families should therefore examine the chosen room configuration carefully before arrival rather than assuming generous floor space.

The available reviews do not provide enough consistent detail to assess noise, views, bathrooms or in-room facilities. Prospective guests primarily concerned with those features should check the exact room description attached to their booking.

Service strengths and inconsistencies

Staff warmth is the strongest recurring theme. Reviewers repeatedly single out employees for being welcoming, efficient and willing to help, rather than offering only general praise. Early-arrival assistance, luggage handling and patient front-desk support all contribute to the positive picture.

Still, travellers with specific needs may benefit from confirming arrangements directly. One guest staying on crutches after a knee injury described notifying reception about limited mobility and later making a specific housekeeping request. The supplied account does not include the final resolution, so it should not be treated as evidence of a broader accessibility or housekeeping problem. It does, however, reinforce the value of documenting time-sensitive requests.

Who should stay

The hotel appears best suited to couples and short-stay visitors who can accept compact accommodation in exchange for personable service and an energetic hotel experience. The rooftop is the clearest leisure highlight in the supplied feedback, with one guest calling it a major part of the stay.

The overall verdict is positive but qualified. Warm staff interactions and smooth handling of many arrivals support the strong public rating. Small rooms and the possibility of check-in confusion around refundable authorizations are the main cautions. Guests who verify payment terms and room dimensions in advance are likely to arrive with expectations that better match the experience described in reviews.

Plan the rest of the trip

• More hotels in United States
• What else is worth booking in New York, United States
• All United States travel reviews
• Browse every destination we cover